Evolution or Creation?
1994-12-04 · Source: tparents.org
Sun Myung Moon December 4, 1994 Cheon Seong Gyeong, Book 11: The Root of the Universe, Chapter 1: Section 4.1
Photo date and location unknown
How far back does history go? Does it post-date or pre-date the theory of evolution? What is the theory of evolution? Sparrows and buntings are cousins. They are the same. Their bone structure as well as every other feature is exactly alike. What differs between the two is the color of their feathers; everything else, even their sexual organs and eyes is identical. Be that as it may, if they were told to do so, would the sparrow and the bunting be able to exchange their mates with one another, mate and reproduce? Would a chimpanzee and another kind of monkey be able to do so even if they tried for thousands of years, or not? (232-126, 1992.7.3)
Sparrows and buntings are siblings. What do you think? This statement is 100 percent correct when compared with the relationship between monkeys and human beings. Then if a sparrow were to mate with a bunting, would they give birth to a new kind of bird? Scholars in the secular world believe that because their outward appearance and structure are similar they must have evolved. They deny the logic that everything has developed through lovemaking between male and female and their resultant reproduction. How complicated do you all think the sexual organs are? With most fish, the females and males do not
come into physical contact at all. It is different on land. (199-307, 1990.2.21)
How old is the planet Earth in this solar system? It has been revolving for billions of years, and yet has it ever been off-course by the merest trifle? It is right on course day after day. All of creation is the same: Would the way that American sparrows and Korean sparrows build their nests be the same or different? Give me your answer. Are they the same or different? They would be the same. From the viewpoint of evolutionary theory, the way sparrows build their nests should develop over time, shouldn’t it? If so, then how is it that, without learning from anyone, they have been building their nests in the same way for tens of thousands of years? How do they know about building their nests? The swallows build their nests in their own way, as do the sparrows and the orioles. In the latter case, they build their nests hanging from tree branches. (179-246, 1988.8.12)
If you were to bring together a male king orangutan and an ugly woman, marry them, and make them pray and offer devotions for ten thousand years, would they ever have offspring? Would they be able to produce a baby? Give me an answer, you descendants of monkeys, communist gangsters! Do you think that offspring could be produced from the marriage of an orangutan and a woman, if the communist world were to pray and implement all kinds of force, or do you think that impossible? If you do not know, don’t insist upon communism or evolutionary theory. You should all wise up to that. (262-80, 1994.7.23)
To go from the level of an amoeba to that of a monkey, gates of love for thousands of species need to be passed through upward. Evolutionary theory has ignored this fact. Would it be possible to move to a higher level without passing through different species? Can birds mate with insects? Can birds ascend without relating to the animal kingdom? It makes no sense to claim such a thing just because the bone structure is the same, and omit the fact that they need to grow through the relationship of love, the gates of love. Can giving birth over the generations bring forth something better? It may only produce something inferior . The problem arising here is that those people do not know about the love relationship. (254-264, 1994.2.15)
The differentiation of species is very strict. There are thousands of species between amoebae and monkeys. Each of these species brings forth their young through the gates of the females and males, which means thousands of births. The thinking that one could go from one species to another disregarding the levels of thousands of species would suggest that it could all be done within one birth, a notion that is completely wrong because it denies the fact that the gates of love need to be passed through. How can an amoeba pass through the gates of love for thousands of species and become a human being? Would similar bone structures make all the other characteristics similar too? Similar bone structures can be found everywhere. Stop saying such crazy things. (266-39, 1994.12.4)
Considering the origin of species from the viewpoint of present-day evolutionary theory, we can definitely say that a species cannot come about just like that. There must be a male and female. This is true for the mineral world as well. For a substance to be formed, the positive ion must fuse with the negative ion. There must be positive and negative, male and female. (213-63, 1991.1.14)