Bitter Winter: South Korea: A Law to Dissolve Churches at Will

BITTER — HOME ABOUT CHINA v FROM THE WORLD v INTERVIEWS DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS v ABOUT EDITORIAL BOARD TOPICS p WINTER

You are here: Home » From the World » News Global Search

South Korea: A Law to Dissolve NEWSLETTER Churches at Will by Massimo lnt rovigne I Feb 23, 2026 I News Global Email address: Your email address

The bill now being considered by the Parliament would be the most draconian in the democratic world and mark the quiet death of Mil religious liberty in the country. by Massimo tntrovigne SU PPORT BITTER WINTER

( Donate ) = — ~ ~ - -~ ~ ~

-- MOST READ The Winter Olympics Story Beij ing Does Not Want You to Read

South Korea: A Law to Dissolve Churches at Will

China, You’re Never Too Old or Too Young to Fight “Cults and South Korean President LeeJae Myung with Xi Jinping. Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Illegal Religions” People’s Republic of China. Africans Converts to the Russ ian Orthodox Church Are Lured to South Ko rea’s Parliament is currently considering a legal amendment that is so Russia, Then Forced t o Fight i n extensive and dismissive of constitutional protections that one might question Ukraine whether its authors expect the publ ic to read beyond the introduction. The proposal states, i n its official explanation, that cu rrent law permits authorities to The Dark Side of the Hong Kong revoke a nonprofit corporation’s establishment permit only when it “conducts White Paper: Fear Grows After activities outside its stated purpose, violates the condit ions of its establishment the Jimmy Lai Verdict permit, or engages in acts harmful to the public int erest.” It then expresses China: Christian Missionary Dong concern that “cases have occurred in which organizations commit anti-social acts, Yanmei Still Detained Despite principle of separation of religion and state,” yet there are not enough legal means to sanction them effectively. The drafters also argue that even when authorities identify wrongdoing, “the lack of clear investigative authority makes LEGAL effective supervision structurally difficult.” Their proposed solution is to “clarify Privacy Policy t he grounds for revoking establishment permits, codify investigative powers, and strengthen the system t hat requ ires the remaining assets of anti-social corporations to go to the national treasury, thus preventing abuse of corporate status and protecting constitutional order.”

This is a striking example of legislative language: a declaration of good intentions hiding a plan for unprecedented government intrusion into religious life. When expressed in simpler terms, the amendment becomes a tool for dissolving churches at will, conducting searches without warrants, and seizing their property.

The amendment to Article 37 is the first warning sign. It gives authorities the power to require rel igious organizations to provide financial and operational records w ith little notice. This creates a constant com pliance burden. Any church t hat hesitates, questions the request, or cannot produce documents quickly enough r isks being seen as uncooperative or suspicious.

The revised Article 38 goes even fu rther, allowing t he government to revoke a religious organization’s establ ishment permit, inter alia, if it is seen as having “violated the separation of rel igion and state” or “harmed the public interest.” These terms are so broad t hat they could apply to nearly any type of political expression. A pastor who criticizes a government policy, a Buddhist group that opposes a development project, or a Catholic bishop who speaks out on human rights could all be accused of political involvement or harming the public interest. The amendment allows for dissolution if any “representative, director, or agent’’ is sentenced to prison for actions “related to the organization” and done repeatedly. The actions of one person could lead the state to d issolve an entire religious group.

The amendment appears to have been drafted with the case of Mother Han in

mind, the leader of the Unification Church, who is currently in jail awaiting trial. If she is sentenced, this will be an automatic ground for the dissolution of her church, without further invest igation. But even the sentencing of a lesser “director or agent” would be enough to trigger dissolution.

Mother Han, the “Mother of Peace.” Source: Universal Peace Federation.

Then we see the newly created Article 38-2, which allows officials to enter church premises and inspect financial records, documents, and property status based only on suspicion, without a warrant. The amendment’s own j ustification notes that the investigative authority is currently unclear. Its solution is to remove ambiguity by eliminating judicial oversight. A government that disapproves of a church’s sermons, advocacy, or political views can now enter without warning, search through its documents, and carry out intrusive inspections under the guise of administrative oversight.

Finally, the amendment to Article 80 seals the framework of control. If a religious organization’s permit is revoked, its remaining assets “may not be transferred to other religious entities” and instead go to the National Treasury. In other words, they are confiscated. A dissolved church cannot pass on its property to another denomination, a mission organization, or a charity. The state takes everything from

its buildings to its bank accounts and sacred objects. The amendment claims this will prevent “abuse of corporate status.” In truth, it guarantees that once the government dissolves a religious body, nothing of it remains.

Together, these provisions create a legal environment where the government can silence religious critics, dismantle disfavored groups, and seize their assets with little procedural resistance. The amendment’s repeated mentions of “safeguarding constitutional order” border on the absurd. The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom of religion conditioned on government approval of one’s sermons. The separation of religion and state is intended to prevent government interference in religious matters, not to empower the government to dissolve religious bodies for political purposes.

If passed, this amendment would position South Korea among the world’s most intrusive regulatory systems for religious organizations, aligning it with the Chinese model. It would equip any future administration- regardless of its political stance-with the tools to intimidate, silence, or dismantle religious communit ies that fall out of favor. If Parliament genuinely wants to uphold constitutional order, it should start by rejecting laws that violate it.

Full text of the proposal and draft bill

Partial Amendment Bill to the Civil Act (Proposed by Representative Choi Hyuk-jin)

I Bill No. 115932

Date of Proposal: January 9, 2026 Proposers: Choi Hyuk-jin, Kim Woo-young, Kim Jun-hyuk, Kim Jae-won, Kwon Chil-seung, Yeom Tae-young, Lee Geon-tae, Lee Su ng-yoon, SongJae-bong, Seo Mi-hwa and Son Sol (11 members)

Purpose of the Proposal and Main Contents

Under the current law, when a non-profit corporation conducts business beyond its stated purpose, violates the conditions of its establishment permit, or engages in other acts that harm the public interest, the competent authority may revoke

its establishment permit.

However, the requirement of”other acts that harm the public interest” is overly broad and abstract, resulting in low legal predictability and leading to passive responses by the competent authority. In particular, there have recently been cases in which some non-profit corporations have abused their corporate status to commit serious crimes in an organized and repeated manner, or engage in antisocial conduct, such as colluding with specific political forces in violation of the constitutional principle of separation of religion and state. Nevertheless, the legal means to effectively sanction such conduct remain insufficient.

Furthermore, even when the competent authority becomes aware of unlawful acts, the authority responsible for investigating them is not clearly defined, creating a structural limitation that makes effective supervision difficult.

Accordingly, this bill seeks to specify the grounds for revoking the establishment permit of a corporation, clearly stipulate the investigative authority of the competent administrative agency, and strengthen the system under which the residual assets of antisocial corporations revert to the national treasury, thereby preventing the abuse of corporate personality and safeguarding the constitutional order (proposed Article 37, etc.).

Act No. (blank)

Partial Amendment Bill to the Civil Act

Part of the Civil Act shall be amended as follows.

The portion of Article 37 other than the title shall be designated as Paragraph (1 ). and Paragraphs (2) through (4) shall be newly added to the same Article as follows: (2) Where necessary for inspection and supervision under Paragraph (1 ), the competent authority may take the following measures with respect to a corporation:

Order the submission of relevant documents, ledgers, or other reference materials;

Have affil iated public officials inspect the corporation’s affairs and financial status;

Require the attendance and statements of the corporation’s representative or its officers and employees. (3) A public official who inspects a corporation’s affairs pursuant to Paragraph (2)2 shall carry identification indicating such authority and present it to the relevant persons. (4) Before taking measures under Paragraph (2), the competent authority shall provide the corporation with an opportunity to submit its opinion. However, this shall not apply where urgency is required or where it is deemed that granting an opportunity to submit opinions would make it impossible to achieve the purpose of supervision.

Article 38 shall be amended as follows: Article 38 (Revocation of Establishment Permit of a Corporation) (1) The competent authority may revoke the establishment permit of a corporation where the cor poration falls under any one of the following subparagraphs.

When it conducts business beyond its stated purpose;

When it violates the conditions of its establishment permit;

When, without justifiable grounds, it fails to commence its purpose business within one year from the date of receiving the establishment permit, or has no business performance for one year or longer;

When the corporation’s representative, director, or agent is finally convicted of a crime related to the corporation’s affairs punishable by imprisonment without labor or heavier punishment under other statutes, and such conduct is repeatedly carried out at the organizational level of the corporation or is condoned by the corporation;

When the corporation violates the principle of separation of religion and state under Article 20(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea or related laws such as the Public Official Election Act, and systematically and repeatedly intervenes in political activities related to elections, political parties, or candidates in an organized manner, thereby significantly harming the public interest;

When, through a serious act equivalent to the grounds in subparagraphs 1 through 5, the corporation otherwise violates laws or significantly harms the public int erest.

(2) Where the competent authority intends to revoke the establishment permit pursuant to Paragraph (1 ), it shall conduct a hearing.

(3) Even where grounds under the subparagraphs of Paragraph (1) exist, if the degree of violation is minor or correction is possible, the competent authority may set a period and order corrective measures. In such cases, if the corporation fai ls to make corrections within that period, the establishment permit may be revoked.

Article 38-2 shall be newly established as follows.

Article 38-2 (Investigation of Business and Financial Status) (1) Where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a corporation falls under any of the subparagraphs of Article 38(1 ), the competent authority may order the corporation to submit reports on its business and financial status or require the submission of necessary materials.

(2) Where necessary for verification under Paragraph (1 ), the competent authority may have affiliated public officials enter the corporation’s office, place of business, or other locations to inspect ledgers, documents, and other items, or to question relevant persons.

(3) A public official who conducts entry, inspection, or questioning pursuant to Paragraph (2) shall carry identification indicating such authority and present it to the relevant persons.

(4) Entry, inspect ion, or questioning under Paragraph (2) shall not be construed as being for criminal investigation.

Paragraphs (4) and (5) shall be newly added to Article 80 as follows:

(4) Where a corporation’s establishment permit is revoked on the grounds specified in Article 38(1 )4 or 5, its residual assets shall, notwithstanding Paragraphs (1) and (2), revert to the national treasury.

(5) Assets that have reverted to the national treasury pursuant to Paragraph (4) shall be managed by the competent authority and may be used for similar public interest purposes.

Article 1 (Effective Date) This Act shall enter into force on the date six months after its promulgation.

Article 2 (Application) The amended provisions of Article 80(4) shall apply from cases in which, after the enforcement of this Act, a corporation’s establishment permit is revoked on the grounds specified in Article 38(1 )4 or 5.

Article 3 (Transitiona l Measures) The amended provisions of Article 38-2 shall apply to investigation or supervisory procedures concerning corporations that are in progress at the time this Act enters into force.

Comparison Table of New and Existing Provisions

Current Proposed Amendment

Article 37 (Inspection and Supervision Article 37 (Inspection and Supervision of a Corporation’s Affairs) (om itted) of a Corp oration’s Affairs) (1) (Same as the current provision <Newly inserted> except for the title) (2) Where necessary for inspect ion and supervision under Paragraph (1 ), the competent authority may take the following measures with respect to a corporat ion: Order the submission of relevant documents, ledgers, or other reference materials; Have affiliated public officials inspect the corporat ion’s affa irs and financial status; Require the attendance and statements of the corporation’s representative or its officers and employees. (3) A public official who <Newly inserted> inspects a corporation’s affairs pursuant to Paragraph (2)2 shall carry identification indicating such authority and present it to the relevant persons. <Newly inserted> (4) Before taking measures under Paragraph (2), the competent authority shall provide the corporation with an opportunity to submit its opinion. However, this shall not apply where urgency is required or where it is deemed that grant ing an opportunity to submit opinions would make it impossible to achieve the Article 38 {Revocation of purpose of supervision. Establishment Perm it of a Article 38 (Revocation of Corporation) Where a corporation Establishment Permit of a conducts business Corporation)

beyond its purpose, violates the conditions of its establishment permit, or commits other acts harmful to the public interest, the competent (1) The competent authority may authority may revoke such permit. revoke the establishment permit of a corporat ion where the corporation falls under any one of the following c , 1hn:.r ::ior::1nhc· \Mhon it r nnrl11rtc

__,…,._,t-’’-”’’-’6’ … t-’’ ‘-’• W W l l “- 1 1 I\.._.._,,,,._,…,._,.__,

business beyond its purpose; When it violates the condit ions of its establishment permit; When, without justifiable grounds, it fails to commence its purpose business within one year from the date of receiving the establishment permit, or has no business performance for one year or longer; When the corporation’s representative, director, or agent is finally convicted of a crime related to the corporation’s affairs punishable by imprisonment without labor or a heavier penalty under other statutes, and such conduct is repeated ly carried out at the organizational level of the corporat ion or is condoned by the corporat ion; Where the corporation violates the principle of separation of religion and state as prescribed in Article 20(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, or related statutes such as the Publ ic Official Election Act, and, in relation to elections, political parties, or candidates, systematically and repeatedly

intervenes in politica l activities in an organized and structured manner, thereby significantly harming the public interest; When, through a serious act equivalent to the grounds outlined in subparagraphs 1 through 5, the corporation otherwise violates laws or significantly harms the public interest. (2) Where the competent authority intends to revoke the establishment permit pursuant to Paragraph (1 ), it shall conduct a hearing. (3) Even where grounds under the subparagraphs of Paragraph (1) exist, if the degree of the violation is minor or correction is possible, the competent authority may set a period and order corrective measures. In such cases, if the corporat ion fails to make corrections within that period, the establishment <Newly inserted> permit may be revoked. Article 38-2 (Investigation of Business and Financial Status) (1) Where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a corporat ion falls under any of t he subparagraphs of Article 38(1), the competent authority may order the corporat ion to submit reports on its business operations and financial status or requ ire the submission of necessary materials. (2) Where necessary for verification

under Paragraph (1 ), the competent authority may have affiliated public officials enter the corporation’s office, place of business, or other locations to inspect l edgers, documents, and other items, or to question relevant persons. (3) A public official who conducts entry, inspection, or questioning pursuant to Paragraph (2) shall carry identification indicating such authority and present it to the relevant persons. (4) Entry, inspection, or questioning under Paragraph (2) shall not be

conscruea as oemg ror cnmInaI invest igation.

Article 80 (Attribution of Residual Assets) (1) to (3) (Same as the current Article 80 (Attribution of Residual provision) Assets) (1) to (3) (omitted) (4) Where a corporation’s <Newly inserted> establishment permit is revoked on the grounds specified in Article 38(1 )4 or 5, its residual assets shall, notwithstanding Paragraphs (1) and (2), revert to the national treasury. <Newly inserted> (5) Assets that have reverted to the national treasury pursuant to Paragraph (4) shall be managed by the competent authority and may be used for similar public interest purposes.

Religious Liberty, South Korea, Unification Church

Massimo lntrovigne Massimo lntrovigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. lntrovigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia de/le religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the lnterdisciQlinary Iournal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press· Nova Relig[Q. From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Securi!Y. and Co-012eration in Euro12e (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

Sout h Africa: The Return of Silencing the Churches: Vict ims and Protectors: the Would -Be Religious Why Korea’s New Rhetoric Who Needs Whom? The Police Threatens Democrat ic Rudnev Case in Argentina. Freedom Jan 29, 2026 Jan 22, 2026 Jan 23, 2026